Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
Posted: 15 Sep 2014 05:42 PM PDT Price Deflation Hits Italy First Time in 55 Years The Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) reports that consumer price inflation declined by 0.1% from August 2013 to August 2014. Italian consumer prices fell 0.1 percent year-on-year in August of 2014, matching preliminary estimates. The country's annual inflation rate touched the negative territory for the first time in nearly 55 years due to a drop in energy prices.Italy CPI 2000 - 2014 Eurozone Policymakers Concerned About Falling Prices A Financial Times headline portrays falling prices as a negative thing: Deflation Takes Shine Off Sales for Italy's Shopkeepers. The appearance of deflation in Italy suggests a worrying spread from Spain, another peripheral eurozone economy, where it reared its head this year. Deflation is now stalking the home of Rome-born Mario Draghi, the European Central Bank president, who has sounded the alarm about the need to restore growth across the continent and has taken aggressive and unorthodox measures to do so.Deflationary Spiral Nonsense The idea that falling prices are bad for the economy is ridiculous. Taking out insurance against falling prices is even more absurd. Ask any consumer if he wants lower gas prices, lower food prices, lower hotel prices, lower computer prices, or lower prices on any consumer items and the answer will be yes. Next, ask any consumer who needs a coat, computer, TV, or any other needed item if he would he wait a year to buy one because prices were falling. Assuming the consumer had enough money to buy any needed item, he would buy that item now. Thus, the entire deflationary spiral concept of consumers delaying purchases because prices are falling is ridiculous. Keynesian Theory vs. Practice Keynesian theory says consumers will delay purchases if prices are falling. In practice, all things being equal, it's precisely the opposite. If consumers think prices are too high, they will wait for bargains. It happens every year at Christmas and all year long on discretionary items not in immediate need. In general, people like bargains, and when bargains get big enough, people do not wait for even bigger bargains. Consider Christmas shopping. Most do not wait until after Christmas when bargains are even bigger than before Christmas. Yet, these ridiculous myths of consumers waiting because prices are falling as opposed to consumers waiting for prices they can afford have been repeated so many times that people actually believe them. Delays For Other Reasons People do delay purchases if they don't have a job, or the money, or they perceive prices are simply too high. The problem is typically debt, not falling prices. If consumers have too much debt or too little income they cannot buy. If businesses have too much debt they cannot expand. If governments have too much debt, they eventually run into problems. Assets vs. Consumer Goods Asset prices are different. Consumers will buy houses, stocks, bonds, land, and other assets they if they perceive central bank inflation will bail them out with ever-increasing asset price inflation. Eventually prices get ridiculously stretched. Then when the greater fool stops buying, bubbles burst, asset prices fall, and then debt deflation takes over. Debts cannot be paid back, businesses cannot hire, and consumers out of a job cannot shop. Keynesian Nonsense Keynesian economists want government to pick up the slack when businesses fail. That's nonsense. Several decades of Keynesian and Monetarist attempts to jump start the Japanese economy with nothing to show for it but debt to the tune of 250% of GDP should be proof enough. Falling prices are never the problem. Rather it's central-bank sponsored inflation that causes asset bubbles and promotes debt and malinvestment that is the problem. The solution, that no central bank cares to promote, is to not sponsor assets bubbles in the first place. Once in asset bubbles, the best thing to do is let the bust play out. Assuming Japan remains on its current path, the upcoming collapse in the Yen will provide the final proof that Keynesian economics is pure idiocy. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
Posted: 15 Sep 2014 11:43 AM PDT War and peace factions are at odds in Ukraine. The war factions claim Putin cannot be trusted but the peace factions have finally had enough of war. The likely loss of Mariupol within weeks was simply too much to take. One thing is certain, more killing will only make matters worse. Ukraine Offers Amnesty to Rebels, 3 Years of Limited Self-Rule RTE reports Eastern Ukraine Offered Three Years of Limited Self-Rule. Ukraine's president has offered parts of the country's separatist east limited self-rule for three years under the terms of a peace plan reached with Russia."War" and "Peace" Factions Split Ukraine The above details sound like a reasonable start of negotiations to me. However, the "war party" led by Ukraine's prime minister will have nothing to do with it. Please consider "War" and "Peace" Factions Split Ukraine Politics An agreement to secure a permanent end to fighting might avoid more casualties in a war that has cost 3,000 Ukrainian lives and has involved Russian troops directly since last month – but at the cost of Ukraine potentially losing control of the separatist-held regions of Donetsk and Lugansk.More Killing is No Way to Honor Dead Anyone remember the ridiculous pro-war argument during the Vietnam War? "It would be a dishonor to the dead to pull out now." So instead, thousands more soldiers died to "save honor" for the already dead. Honoring the dead with more dead didn't work then, and it won't work now. That should be a lesson for the party of war, but it won't be. Ceasefire Under Pressure The Financial Times reports Violence Puts Ukraine Ceasefire Under Pressure. Fighting in eastern Ukraine continued on Monday in the worst violence between pro-Kiev forces and Russian-backed separatists since a fragile ceasefire was brokered on September 5.Who to Believe? There are likely war proponents in both the rebel and the Ukraine side. However, it is 100% clear Ukraine's prime minister Arseniy Yatseniuk wants a war conclusion with total surrender of the rebels. With Yatseniuk in control of the "Popular Front" volunteer "Far Right" activists, it's easy to see where the problem might be. Without a doubt Obama, McCain, and NATO hope for more war. Ukraine in NATO is the goal. I propose peace is a far better deal than WWIII. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment