Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
Tantalizing Stupidity and the Case for Gold Posted: 10 Oct 2015 05:45 PM PDT Financial Repression Insanity Purportedly the Fed is ready willing and able to go to next step of financial repression insanity: Negative Interest Rates. Federal Reserve officials now seem open to deploying negative interest rates to combat the next serious recession even though they rejected that option during the darkest days of the financial crisis in 2009 and 2010.Tantalizing Stupidity For starters, negative interest rates should be seen as what they are: theft. Actually, the inflationist policies of central banks are theft, but negative interest rate proposals go one step further down the rabbit hole. With this proposal, we can add Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Minneapolis Fed, and Miles Kimball, an economics professor at the University of Michigan to the never-ending list of economically illiterate jackasses. There is absolutely no benefit with financial repression measures that further punish those on fixed income. The positive effects these clowns see are nothing but a mirage that will vanish as soon as asset bubbles collapse. The problem is debt coupled with asset bubbles created by debt, yet the proposed solution is to make people spend more while taking away scarce resources of those who save. Financial Repression I recently discussed financial repression with Gordon Long. Link if video does not play: Mish's Monthly Macro w/Gordon T Long Our focus in that interview was the sorry state of affairs in Illinois. Our next interview no doubt will be on negative interest rates. Case for Gold It is F*ing stupid to attempt to force people to spend money on things they don't want or need on the inane belief demand is too low and wasting money is the cure. These economic idiots will never stop, which is one reason why I am firmly committed to gold over the long haul. Mike "Mish" Shedlock |
Posted: 10 Oct 2015 12:41 PM PDT Russian interference in Syria has had one positive aspect already: US Scraps Scheme to Create Syrian Rebel Force. The US is halting a controversial $500m programme to create a rebel force in Syria after concluding that it was having practically no impact in the battle against Isis fighters in the war-torn country.Since arming Syrian al Qaeda "rebel" terrorists was always a bad idea, I would call this bit of news a distinct positive. Hillary Flashbacks Last Year the Guardian reported Hillary Clinton Wanted to Arm Syrian Rebels, Memoir Reveals. On February 1, 2015, the Washington Times reported Secret Benghazi Report Reveals Hillary's Libya War Push Armed al Qaeda-Tied Terrorists. On July 1, in the Washington Times article Hillary's Secret War Judge Andrew Napolitano listed his conclusion after reviewing documents and emails from a period in which Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. Napolitano stated "What I saw has persuaded me beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty that Mrs. Clinton provided material assistance to terrorists and lied to Congress in a venue where the law required her to be truthful." Succession of Bad Ideas Recall that one of the reasons president Bush gave for invading Iraq was that Hussein was harboring al Qaeda. In reality, al Qaeda did not exist in Iraq to any degree until the US invaded and put in a dangerously unstable government. ISIS was the direct result. In the wake of the Iraq mess, the US armed alleged "moderate rebels" in three places. It backfired in Libya, Iraq, and Syria. Arming al Qaeda is absurd. Rand Paul on Arming Kurds In a March 10 interview, senator Rand Paul said Arm the Kurds to Battle ISIS and Radical Islam, Give Them Kurdistan. In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News, likely 2016 GOP presidential candidate Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) staked out a bold position on a foreign policy matter—pushing to arm Kurdish fighters against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) even more than the U.S. has already done, but also calling for the creation of a new nation of Kurdistan.Map-Making Problems Should the US be drawing lines, promising to build countries? Or should the US tell the Kurds that if they create a country, the US would recognize it? Something else? A Wikipedia Map of Kurdistan highlights the issues with re-drawing lines. "Contemporary use of the term refers to four parts of a greater Kurdistan, which include parts of southeastern Turkey (Northern Kurdistan), northern Syria (Western Kurdistan), northern Iraq (Southern Kurdistan), and western Iran (Eastern Kurdistan). Some Kurdish nationalist organizations seek to create an independent nation state of Kurdistan, consisting of some or all of the areas with Kurdish majority, while others campaign for greater Kurdish autonomy within the existing national boundaries." The Kurds are fighting ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Turkey is fighting the Kurds in Turkey. Turkey does not want an independent Kurdistan in Iraq for fear it will lose part of Turkey in the process. And what about Iran? Would it cede territory to a new Kurdish state? Simply put, the US should not be in the map-making business. Nor should the US arm terrorists. But what is the definition of terrorist? Terrorism in the Eyes of the Beholder
Twin Blasts at Turkish Peace Rally In an unfortunate incident this weekend, Twin Blasts at Turkish Peace Rally Kill at Least 86. A twin bombing in Ankara has killed at least 86 people at a peace rally, the deadliest attack in Turkey's history.Kurdistan Worker's Party Wikipedia reports the Kurdistan Worker's Party "(PKK) is usually used interchangeably for the name of its armed wing, the People's Defence Force (HPG), which was formerly called the Kurdistan National Liberty Army (ARGK). The PKK is listed as a terrorist organization internationally by several states and organizations, including the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) and the European Union. However countries such as India, China, Russia, Switzerland and Egypt have not designated the PKK as a terrorist organization. Also, the UN has not listed the PKK as a terrorist organisation." Mideast Mapmaking Reason.Com had these comments on mapmaking. Paul didn't merely say that if the Kurds succeed in carving out a territory, the U.S. should recognize it. He said America should actively involve itself in launching the state and establishing its borders.Mish Proposals
Mike "Mish" Shedlock |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment