Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

Rasmussen Poll: 57% Okay With Government Shutdown If It Leads to Deeper Budget Cuts
BLS Jobs Report: Nonfarm Payroll +216,000, Unemployment Rate 8.8%; Thoughts on the Jobs Report
Home Buyers' Strike in Australia; Bubble Set to Burst; Steve Keen on the Oz Bubble; What You Can Do

Rasmussen Poll: 57% Okay With Government Shutdown If It Leads to Deeper Budget Cuts

Posted: 01 Apr 2011 10:54 AM PDT

A Rasmussen poll says 57% Okay With Government Shutdown If It Leads to Deeper Budget Cuts

A majority of voters are fine with a partial shutdown of the federal government if that's what it takes to get deeper cuts in federal government spending.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 57% of Likely U.S. Voters think making deeper spending cuts in the federal budget for 2011 is more important than avoiding a partial government shutdown. Thirty-one percent (31%) disagree and say avoiding a shutdown is more important. Twelve percent (12%) are not sure.

The legislators have avoided a shutdown by passing a series of stopgap budget bills, but several conservative Republicans now say they will not support any more of these measures. In the event of a shutdown, payments for things like Social Security, Medicare and unemployment benefits would continue.

Still, a plurality (44%) of voters thinks a partial shutdown of the federal government would be bad for the economy, down four points from February. Twenty-three percent (23%) say a shutdown would be good for the economy, while a similar number (22%) say it would have no impact, a seven-point increase from the previous survey.

I happen to think a government shutdown would be a good thing. People would find out the world will not end as Tim Geithner and the Obama administration seem to believe. Nor will the bond market fall apart as some at the Fed think.

However, it is ridiculous for Republicans to be in this situation over a measly $30 billion, less than 1% of the budget.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List

BLS Jobs Report: Nonfarm Payroll +216,000, Unemployment Rate 8.8%; Thoughts on the Jobs Report

Posted: 01 Apr 2011 08:27 AM PDT

Thoughts on the Jobs Report

This was a second solid jobs report, not as measured by the typical recovery, but the best back-to-back reports we have seen for years.

At the current pace, the unemployment number would ordinarily drop, but not fast. However, many of those millions who dropped out of the workforce could start looking if they think jobs may be out there. Should that happen, the unemployment rate could rise, even if the economy adds jobs at this pace. It is very questionable if this pace of jobs keeps up.

Bear in mind that the unemployment rate varies in accordance with the "household survey" not the reported headline jobs number.

In the last year, the civilian population rose by 1,841,000. Yet the labor force dropped by 489,000. Those not in the labor force rose by 2,330,000.

In January alone, a whopping 319,000 people dropped out of the workforce. In February (last months' report) another 87,000 people dropped out of the labor force. This month 11,000 people dropped out of the labor force.

Were it not for people dropping out of the labor force, the unemployment rate would be over 11%.

February 2011 Jobs Report

Please consider the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) March 2011 Employment Report.

Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 216,000 in March, and the unemployment rate was little changed at 8.8 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in professional and business services, health care, leisure and hospitality, and mining. Employment in manufacturing continued to trend up.

Unemployment Rate - Seasonally Adjusted

Nonfarm Payroll Employment - Seasonally Adjusted Changes

Nonfarm Payroll Employment - Seasonally Adjusted Total

Notice that employment is lower than it was 10 years ago.

Establishment Data

Employment in the private sector rose by 230,000 in March. Since reaching a low point in employment in February 2010, the private sector has added 1.8 million jobs — an average of 138,000 per month.

Statistically, 127,000 jobs a month is enough to keep the unemployment rate flat.

Index of Aggregate Weekly Hours

During March, the average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls was unchanged at 34.3 hours. The average workweek for production and nonsupervisory employees on private nonfarm payrolls increased by 0.1 hour to 33.6 hours.

The index of aggregate weekly hours for all employees rose by 0.2 percent over the
month. Since a reaching a low point in October 2009, the index has increased by 3.0
percent.

Average Hourly Earnings vs. CPI

Average hourly earnings of all employees in the private sector were unchanged in March at $22.87. Hourly earnings are up 1.7 percent over the year.

Between February 2010 and February 2011, the consumer price index for all urban
consumers (CPI-U) increased by 2.2 percent.

Not only are wages rising slower than the CPI, there is also a concern as to how those wage gains are distributed.

BLS Birth-Death Model Black Box

The big news in the BLS Birth/Death Model is the BLS has moved to quarterly rather than annual adjustments.

Effective with the release of January 2011 data on February 4, 2011, the establishment survey will begin estimating net business birth/death adjustment factors on a quarterly basis, replacing the current practice of estimating the factors annually. This will allow the establishment survey to incorporate information from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages into the birth/death adjustment factors as soon as it becomes available and thereby improve the factors.

For more details please see Introduction of Quarterly Birth/Death Model Updates in the Establishment Survey

In recent years Birth/Death methodology has been so screwed up and there have been so many revisions that it has been painful to watch.

It is possible that the BLS model is now back in sync with the real world. Moreover, quarterly rather than annual adjustments can only help the process.

The Birth-Death numbers are not seasonally adjusted while the reported headline number is. In the black box the BLS combines the two coming out with a total.

The Birth Death number influences the overall totals, but the math is not as simple as it appears. Moreover, the effect is nowhere near as big as it might logically appear at first glance.

Do not add or subtract the Birth-Death numbers from the reported headline totals. It does not work that way.

Birth/Death assumptions are supposedly made according to estimates of where the BLS thinks we are in the economic cycle. Theory is one thing. Practice is clearly another as noted by numerous recent revisions.

Birth-Death Number Revisions

Inquiring minds note enormous backward revisions in Birth-Death reporting.

Birth Death Model (as reported in January)

Birth Death Model Revisions 2010 (as reported February)

Is this new model going to reflect reality going forward?

That's hard to say, but things were so screwed up before that it is unlikely to be any worse. One encouraging sign is several negative numbers in the recent chart. January would have been negative too, had they shown it. Historically there were only 2 negative number every year, January and July. That anomaly broke November of 2010.

Birth Death Model Revisions 2011 (April)

Do NOT subtract 117,000 from the headline number. That is statistically invalid.

Household Data

In the last year, the civilian population rose by 1,841,000. Yet the labor force dropped by 489,000. Those not in the labor force rose by 2,330,000.

Were it not for people dropping out of the labor force, the unemployment rate would be over 11%.

Households Stats

The number of unemployed persons (13.5 million) and the unemployment rate (8.8 percent) changed little in March. The labor force also was little changed over the month. Since November 2010, the jobless rate has declined by 1.0 percentage point.
The number of job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs, at 8.2 million, was little changed in March but has fallen by 1.3 million since November 2010.
The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks or more) was 6.1 million in March; their share of the unemployed increased from 43.9 to 45.5 percent over the month.
In March, the civilian labor force participation rate held at 64.2 percent, and the employment population ratio, at 58.5 percent, changed little.
The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons was little changed in March, at 8.4 million. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job.
In March, 2.4 million persons were marginally attached to the labor force, up slightly from a year earlier. (These data are not seasonally adjusted.) These individuals were not in the labor force, wanted and were available for work, and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey.

Table A-8 Part Time Status

click on chart for sharper image

There are now 8,433,000 workers whose hours may rise before those companies start hiring more workers.

Note that the number of people working part time for economic reasons rose by 93,000 in the last month.

Table A-15

Table A-15 is where one can find a better approximation of what the unemployment rate really is.

click on chart for sharper image

Distorted Statistics

Given the total distortions of reality with respect to not counting people who allegedly dropped out of the work force, it is hard to discuss the numbers.

The official unemployment rate is 8.8%. However, if you start counting all the people that want a job but gave up, all the people with part-time jobs that want a full-time job, all the people who dropped off the unemployment rolls because their unemployment benefits ran out, etc., you get a closer picture of what the unemployment rate is. That number is in the last row labeled U-6.

While the "official" unemployment rate is an unacceptable 8.8%, U-6 is much higher at 15.7%.

Things are much worse than the reported numbers would have you believe.

That said, this was a solid jobs report, not as measured by the typical recovery, but one of the better reports we have seen for years.

On the negative side, wages are not keeping up with the CPI, wage growth is skewed to the top end, and full time jobs are hard to come by.

At the current pace, the unemployment number would ordinarily drop, but not fast. However, many of those millions who dropped out of the workforce could start looking if they think jobs may be out there. Should that happen, the unemployment rate could rise, even if the economy adds jobs at this pace. It is very questionable if this pace of jobs keeps up.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List

Home Buyers' Strike in Australia; Bubble Set to Burst; Steve Keen on the Oz Bubble; What You Can Do

Posted: 01 Apr 2011 12:39 AM PDT

A huge number of readers from down under have sent emails regarding a property buyers' strike in Australia.

For example, please consider this email from Bron Suchecki at the Perth Mint.

Bron writes ...

Hello Mish,

A Buyers' Strike Campaign is gaining momentum in Australia with mainstream media coverage.

Steve Keen is getting behind it as per his post GetUp campaign suggestion: First Home Property Buyers Strike

What makes this right up your alley is that the campaign started on a website called GetUp .

They style themselves as "an independent political movement to build a progressive Australia. GetUp! brings together like-minded people who want to bring participation back into our democracy."

What is interesting is that according to a comment on this "campaign" (more a complaint) it appears GetUp is supported by Australian unions.

As you know, the Australian Labor Party has strong links to unions, so is GetUp really independent?

It will be interesting to see if GetUp will ignore what appears to be a #1 supported suggestion by their own members, when to run with such a campaign will cause real political problems for the Labor Party.

It's A story worth keeping an eye on.

Regards,
Bron Suchecki
MANAGER, ANALYSIS AND STRATEGY
THE PERTH MINT

Steve Keen Interview on the Property Bubble

Link in case the above video does not display: http://www.brokernews.com.au/tv/the-big-story/the-big-story-is-the-bubble-set-to-burst/963/82509

Homebuyers Strike Back

ABC News reports The Homebuyer Strikes Back

A tiny land tax lobby group has sparked a storm by suggesting first home buyers go on strike to force property prices lower.

Prosper Australia is an organisation devoted to promoting the ideas of 19th-century political economist Henry George, who suggested that income and company tax should be replaced by land tax.

It launched its call for an Australian first home buyer strike on March 15 - since then the idea has gone on to become the number one suggestion on GetUp's campaign ideas forum with 5,644 votes, followed by another housing-related campaign idea to abolish negative gearing.

The online interest has translated into coverage in major daily newspapers and breakfast television, but Prosper Australia spokesman David Collyer says thousands of Australians were already boycotting home purchases before the campaign launched.

"The aim of the campaign is to make first home buyers who are locked out of the market aware that they're not alone, and that their private economic decisions are actually being made by all of their peers at the same time," he told ABC News Online.

Failed Ownership Society Promotion

Steve Keen talked about the Home Buyers' Strike in a couple of posts including Another Getup idea–direct attack on the FHOS

GetUp allows a certain number of votes per email address registration and many people, including Steve Keen, exhausted their votes in favor of the "buyers' strike idea".

I think those buyers' strike vote are somewhat wasted. Buyers will do what they will do and buyers are already on strike.

From my way of thinking it would be better to pressure the Australian government to abandon its ludicrous first time home buyers' grant.

That "Home Buyers' Grant" program sounds very much like President Bush's failed "Ownership Society".

Simply put, government has no business promoting personal choices unless it purposely wants to create bubbles.

If you have votes to spare (or if you have not yet registered) I suggest you cast every one of your votes to Stopping the First Home Buyers Grant. It's time to end the insanity.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List

Home Refinance Calculator

Friday, April 1, 2011

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

No comments:

Post a Comment