Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis |
Russia Not Selling Gold, It's Buying; Reflections on Extremely Sloppy Reporting Posted: 19 Dec 2014 07:24 PM PST On December 17, ZeroHedge asked Will Putin's Next Step Be To Sell Gold? On December 18, ZeroHedge answered his own question wrongly with Russia Has Begun Selling Its Gold, According To SocGen. I did not believe that when I saw it yesterday, and I sure don't today after viewing a few charts from Nick at Gold Charts "R" Us. Russia Gold Reserves Up 600,000 Ounces for November In US dollar terms, Russia's gold reserves are worth about $0.4 billion less. Russia Gold Reserves in US Dollars Of course, Russia may have started selling in December, but that's not precisely what happened either. Gold Chat Debunks Russia Selling Gold Rumor Please consider this snip from the December 19 Gold Chat article ZH fail on Soc Gen fail on Russia selling its gold. As is common in internet land, people pick up stuff by others without doing basic drilling down to the source. The reason you have to do this is because people often misinterpret the source. Other times the source is wrong.Link Sloppiness This this precisely what happens when you are sloppy with links. My major criticism is not that ZeroHedge posted something inaccurately, but that he frequently fails to link to stories. On many occasions ZeroHedge states things like "Bloomberg says" and I spend 15 minutes looking and cannot find anywhere Bloomberg said anything remotely close to what was being attributed. I realize sometimes there is no link. On such occasions, I will say something like via email, no link available. In this case it appears the source of this misrepresentation was Business Insider who also got the story amazingly wrong. On December 12, Business Insider reported Russia Is Fighting Its Financial Problems By Selling The Gold They Have Been Hoarding. Russia is finally using all that gold they have been hoarding.Business Insider Sloppy Reporting Russia is not selling gold, rather the US$ value of its international reserves fell by $4.3. Billion. Here is the opening sentence "Russia's international reserves for the week from November 28 to December 5, decreased from $ 420.5 billion to $ 416.2 billion, the central bank said on Thursday." Gold Chat ended with ... "Editor's Note: Earlier it was reported that the Central Bank's gold reserves decreased by $4.3 billion, quoting Vesti Finance. However, in actuality, it is international reserves assets that have decreased — not gold. Appropriate changes have been made." Now how hard was that fact checking Soc Gen and ZH? ZeroHedge messed up another gold story as well. Please consider the December 17 Gold Chat article Zero Hedge fail on undocumented gold supply story This kind of nonsense is precisely why I am meticulous with links. I want others to carry the same standard. Bloomberg is also terrible. In fact, mainstream media is horrendous in general. Many mainstream media news outlets only link to themselves. And when that happens there is no way to check the facts. Then nonsense like this happens. I rest my case. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
Spain to Abolish Rent Controls; 20,000 Small Businesses May Close; Good Thing or Not? Posted: 19 Dec 2014 12:54 PM PST Abolition of rent controls in Spain this month has prompted some landlords to increase fees by tens of thousands of euros. The Guardian claims Spanish rent changes 'could close 20,000 small businesses'. Is this a good thing? Ponder that question for a moment, but also consider a few snips from the article. Up to 20,000 small Spanish businesses could be forced to close when rent controls are abolished at the end of this month, according to the self-employed workers union. Many of the closures will be emblematic shops that shape the urban landscape in cities such as Madrid, Granada and Barcelona.Good Thing or Not? Is this a good thing? That's a somewhat misleading question because I was not specific. Did I mean a good thing that 20,000 small businesses may close, or that rent controls will be abolished? Then again, does it really matter which question I meant? Let's start with rent controls and work our way through. Without a doubt abolishing rent controls is a good idea. Government interference in the free market is never a good thing. Will rents soar really from €3,000 to €30,000 a month? I rather doubt it, except perhaps in rare cases of a superb high-traffic location. And in such cases, if an owner can really collect that much in rent, then yes, it is a very good thing the existing store closes. A new store would have to generate lots of income and create a lot of jobs to be able to pay that kind of rent. Fear-Mongering The closing of stores is in and of itself neither a good nor bad thing, but more productive uses of capital are always a good thing. In this case, if stores close and new ones open (which is what one would expect if rents go up) then yes, that's a very good thing. The fear-mongering 20,000 store guesstimate by the small business association is highly questionable. But the more stores that close, the faster the Spanish economy is likely to grow as the land-owners will make better use of their land. This was a superb decision by Spain to abolish rent controls. France and Italy should take note of such free-market reforms, because it's going to work. Mike "Mish" Shedlock http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com |
You are subscribed to email updates from Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment